You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some routes (in particular node networks) have no proper name of their
own, but do have a from and/or to attribute set that gives at least some
description of the route.
Note that these routes often do have the `name` or `note` attribute set
using an explicit "from-to" value, but these attributes are not really
meant for that, so for example the Swiss hiking route tagging now
recommends settings only `from` and `to`, not `name` or `note`.
See e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland/HikingNetwork#Wanderwegenetz
As an example of such a route, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13126425
For these routes, setting just `from` or just `to` is also possible (in
particular for node network routes that start at an unnamed
node/guidepost). In this case, the missing attribute is replaced by `?`.
This commit modifies the `relation.nameOrder` preference, adding one
extra special value `from-to` which is handled specially.
0 commit comments