You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My extension dynamically generates a library bundle and sets a path in userThirdParty and checkThirdParty: "ApplyInMemory", to allow the rest of my settings to be applied from the config.json, and library and plugin loaded, with minimal impact on the user's workspace. I currently set these two in the workspace via vscode settings apis, which leads to them being written to settings.json. Persisting these is undesirable as the userThirdParty path is a per-workspace path, which many users have complained about.
I noticed that the extension now provides a setConfig api, and was hoping to use this to provide those settings only in memory, but it seems they are also written back out to settings.json when set this way.
Would it be possible to have an "ApplyInMemory" option on the setConfig api for this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My extension dynamically generates a library bundle and sets a path in
userThirdParty
andcheckThirdParty: "ApplyInMemory"
, to allow the rest of my settings to be applied from the config.json, and library and plugin loaded, with minimal impact on the user's workspace. I currently set these two in the workspace via vscode settings apis, which leads to them being written to settings.json. Persisting these is undesirable as theuserThirdParty
path is a per-workspace path, which many users have complained about.I noticed that the extension now provides a setConfig api, and was hoping to use this to provide those settings only in memory, but it seems they are also written back out to settings.json when set this way.
Would it be possible to have an "ApplyInMemory" option on the setConfig api for this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: