You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to have a single compilation run to produce the starting point for the Insights tab. This avoids having two separate spreadsheet reads and nightmares with what structures are supported and what is not + no having to map between IDs and slugs from separate reads.
Ok, I've rotated through random hacks for parsing this taxonomy, but nothing is sticking. Can you rework it slightly? Problem is that there's too much reliance of the order of lists in the json to keep things unambiguous. If there are similar parent tags in the ontology, or even worse, similar child-parent pairs across the ontology.
Ideally, tagging (both the in the specific paper data and overall taxonomy) would be of the form A > B > C, like we've had already from the CSV parsing.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We want to have a single compilation run to produce the starting point for the
Insights
tab. This avoids having two separate spreadsheet reads and nightmares with what structures are supported and what is not + no having to map between IDs and slugs from separate reads.This is the current compiled JSON schema; and here is an example JSON. Do you need me to modify or add things to it that make your job easier?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: