You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #792 we lowered the threshold for our lighthouse checks in order to un-break our CI/CD and avoid the "expected failures" anti-pattern. This is a follow-up issue to recognize the fact that we want to set targets for accessibility and jobs like lighthouse that balance realistic and also solve the most important accessibility problems.
The crux of the matter is that we have very limited resources, so we need to choose targets for accessibility that are realistic given these resources. We also need to decide that lighthouse scores are a "good" reflection of our targets (maybe based on best practices for how a11y experts recommend using lighthouse).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #792 we lowered the threshold for our lighthouse checks in order to un-break our CI/CD and avoid the "expected failures" anti-pattern. This is a follow-up issue to recognize the fact that we want to set targets for accessibility and jobs like lighthouse that balance realistic and also solve the most important accessibility problems.
The crux of the matter is that we have very limited resources, so we need to choose targets for accessibility that are realistic given these resources. We also need to decide that lighthouse scores are a "good" reflection of our targets (maybe based on best practices for how a11y experts recommend using lighthouse).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: