Skip to content

Update CI to package linux arm64 + build arm64 host #4403

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: feature/linux-arm64
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liliankasem
Copy link
Member

@liliankasem liliankasem commented May 2, 2025

Issue describing the changes in this PR

resolves #4287

Pull request checklist

  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

@@ -146,6 +146,16 @@ jobs:
arguments: -c Release -r linux-x64 -o $(Build.SourcesDirectory)/pkg_output/linux/linux-x64
workingDirectory: $(Build.SourcesDirectory)/src/CoreToolsHost

# do we need to build a linux-arm64 version?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it a requirement to create a custom host with linux-arm64? If so we probably would need to publish it similar to linux-x64

Today we build win-x64, win-arm64, and linux-x64, so it would make sense to also include linux-arm64 but just wanted to double check!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not familiar with custom host so I don't know if this is a requirement or not, but since I saw we have win arm64, I thought it made sence to also do linux

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm ok I see. Maybe we should check with Fabio first to see if this makes sense to add, since VS uses the custom host but I'm not sure if linux-arm64 is a valid use case or not

@liliankasem liliankasem marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2025 19:28
@liliankasem liliankasem requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2025 19:29
Copy link
Contributor

@aishwaryabh aishwaryabh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I just left the comment on double checking that linux-arm64 is a requirement for the custom host, but imo it makes sense to include it. I would just also run this through the consolidated pipeline once all the changes are in just to make sure that the artifact assembler runs as expected producing the correct set of artifacts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants