[Components] modelry #12525 #16350
[Components] modelry #12525 #16350
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis update introduces a set of new action modules for product management within the Modelry integration, including creating, retrieving, and deleting products via API calls. The Modelry app component is extensively implemented with property definitions and methods for CRUD operations, leveraging axios for HTTP requests and supporting dynamic product selection. The package metadata is updated to version 0.1.0, and a new dependency on "@pipedream/platform" is added. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ActionModule
participant ModelryApp
participant ModelryAPI
User->>ActionModule: Trigger action (Create/Get/Delete Product)
ActionModule->>ModelryApp: Call respective method (createProduct/getProduct/deleteProduct)
ModelryApp->>ModelryAPI: Send HTTP request via axios
ModelryAPI-->>ModelryApp: Return API response
ModelryApp-->>ActionModule: Return result
ActionModule-->>User: Output summary and data
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
components/modelry/modelry.app.mjs (3)
94-98: Inconsistent trailing slash in API endpoints.The endpoints in
getProductanddeleteProductinclude a trailing slash (/products/${productId}/) while other endpoints like/productsincreateProductandgetProductsdo not. Consider making this consistent across all endpoints.- path: `/products/${productId}/`, + path: `/products/${productId}`,Also applies to: 102-107
108-113: Consider adding pagination support for getProducts.The
getProductsmethod doesn't handle API pagination. If the Modelry API supports pagination and there are many products, this method might not fetch all of them.async getProducts(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/products", ...args, }); }You could enhance this to automatically handle pagination if needed:
async getProducts(args = {}) { // This is a simplified example - adjust based on the actual API pagination implementation const allProducts = []; let page = 1; let hasMore = true; while (hasMore) { const response = await this._makeRequest({ path: "/products", params: { page }, ...args, }); allProducts.push(...response.data); // Check if there are more pages - this logic depends on the API's pagination scheme hasMore = response.meta?.nextPage || false; page++; } return { data: allProducts }; }
67-83: Consider adding basic error handling in _makeRequest.The
_makeRequestmethod doesn't have any error handling. While errors will propagate to the caller, catching and transforming API errors can provide more helpful error messages.async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { const { $ = this, path, headers, ...otherOpts } = opts; - return axios($, { - ...otherOpts, - url: this._baseUrl() + path, - headers: { - ...headers, - "Content-Type": "application/json", - "Authorization": `${this.$auth.api_token}`, - }, - }); + try { + return await axios($, { + ...otherOpts, + url: this._baseUrl() + path, + headers: { + ...headers, + "Content-Type": "application/json", + "Authorization": `${this.$auth.api_token}`, + }, + }); + } catch (error) { + const statusCode = error.response?.status; + const statusText = error.response?.statusText; + const errorMsg = error.response?.data?.error || error.message; + throw new Error(`Modelry API error (${statusCode} ${statusText}): ${errorMsg}`); + } }components/modelry/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs (1)
54-71: Consider handling empty arrays and null values.The current implementation doesn't handle special cases for array or optional fields. If
this.tagsis undefined, it will be sent as-is to the API. Some APIs expect empty arrays instead of null/undefined values.async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.app.createProduct({ $, data: { product: { sku: this.sku, title: this.title, batch_id: this.batchId, description: this.description, - tags: this.tags, + tags: this.tags || [], dimensions: this.dimensions, external_url: this.externalUrl, }, }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created the product"); return response; }components/modelry/actions/delete-product/delete-product.mjs (1)
4-8: Version consistency with package.json.The action version is set to 0.0.1, while the package.json version was updated to 0.1.0. Consider aligning these versions for consistency.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "0.1.0",components/modelry/actions/get-product/get-product.mjs (2)
18-25: Consider adding error handling.While the implementation is functionally correct, it would be more robust with explicit error handling for API failures.
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.app.getProduct({ - $, - productId: this.productId, - }); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved the product details"); - return response; + try { + const response = await this.app.getProduct({ + $, + productId: this.productId, + }); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved the product details"); + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve product: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },
1-26: Consider adding input validation.Though the propDefinition likely handles basic validation, consider adding additional validation for the productId in the run method to ensure it's in the expected format before making the API call.
async run({ $ }) { + if (!this.productId || typeof this.productId !== 'string') { + throw new Error('A valid product ID is required'); + } const response = await this.app.getProduct({ $, productId: this.productId, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved the product details"); return response; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/modelry/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs(1 hunks)components/modelry/actions/delete-product/delete-product.mjs(1 hunks)components/modelry/actions/get-product/get-product.mjs(1 hunks)components/modelry/modelry.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/modelry/package.json(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/modelry/modelry.app.mjs (3)
64-66: Good implementation of the base URL method.The
_baseUrlmethod correctly provides the API base URL for Modelry. This separation makes it easy to change the base URL if needed in the future.
67-83: Authorization header might be missing a token type prefix.The Authorization header is currently set as just the raw token value. Most REST APIs expect a token type prefix like "Bearer" before the token.
- "Authorization": `${this.$auth.api_token}`, + "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_token}`,Please check the Modelry API documentation to confirm the correct authorization header format.
51-60: Good implementation of dynamic product options.The
optionsmethod for theproductIdprop correctly fetches and maps products into a format suitable for dropdown selection, providing a good user experience.components/modelry/package.json (2)
3-3: Version bump is appropriate for feature additions.The version increase from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 follows semantic versioning principles for adding new features.
15-16: Correct dependency for platform functionality.Adding the @pipedream/platform dependency is necessary for using
axiosfrom the platform in the app file.components/modelry/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs (1)
6-7:✅ Verification successful
Documentation link needs verification.
The documentation link in the description points to
https://files.cgtarsenal.com/api/doc/index.html, which seems like it might be a private URL. Consider using a more accessible public documentation URL if available.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the documentation URL is publicly accessible response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://files.cgtarsenal.com/api/doc/index.html) echo "HTTP Status Code: $response" if [[ $response == 200 ]]; then echo "The documentation URL is publicly accessible" else echo "The documentation URL might not be publicly accessible" fiLength of output: 275
Documentation Link Verified
The URL
https://files.cgtarsenal.com/api/doc/index.html#api-Products-CreateProductreturns HTTP 200 and is publicly accessible, so no changes are needed.components/modelry/actions/delete-product/delete-product.mjs (1)
6-7:✅ Verification successful
Documentation link consistency with other actions.
This action uses the same documentation link as the create-product action. Ensure that this link points to the relevant section for deleting products, not just the general API documentation.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the documentation URL is publicly accessible response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://files.cgtarsenal.com/api/doc/index.html) echo "HTTP Status Code: $response" if [[ $response == 200 ]]; then echo "The documentation URL is publicly accessible" else echo "The documentation URL might not be publicly accessible" fiLength of output: 275
It looks like the Delete Product action’s link already includes the specific “#api-Products-DeleteProduct” anchor and differs from Create Product’s “#api-Products-CreateProduct” anchor, so no change is required here.
components/modelry/actions/get-product/get-product.mjs (3)
1-2: Clean and appropriate import.The import statement correctly references the parent app module, following good module organization practices.
3-8: Component metadata looks good.The component is well-defined with a unique key, clear name, descriptive text with documentation link, version, and proper type specification.
9-17: Props structure follows best practices.Good job reusing the app's property definition for productId. This promotes consistency and reduces duplication across components.
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully created the product"); | ||
| return response; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add response validation before reporting success.
The action currently reports successful product creation regardless of the API response. Consider checking the response status or structure before declaring success.
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully created the product");
- return response;
+ const { data } = response;
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully created product "${data.product.title}" with ID: ${data.product.id}`);
+ return data;This assumes the response includes the created product details. Adjust according to the actual API response structure.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lcaresia if the response includes an ID, I'd apply this suggestion from CodeRabbit, since that is the standard we adopt for summaries
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully created the product"); | ||
| return response; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lcaresia if the response includes an ID, I'd apply this suggestion from CodeRabbit, since that is the standard we adopt for summaries
|
/approve |
|
@lcaresia not sure if you read the previous comment, let me know if you agree with the suggestion or not |
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores