Implement pyqrack interpreter methods for squin dialect

[david-pl]

Closes #185

[github-actions]

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines	Covered	Coverage	Threshold	Status
6644	5706	86%	0%	🟢

New Files

File	Coverage	Status
src/bloqade/pyqrack/squin/_init_.py	100%	🟢
src/bloqade/pyqrack/squin/op.py	100%	🟢
src/bloqade/pyqrack/squin/qubit.py	81%	🟢
src/bloqade/pyqrack/squin/runtime.py	75%	🟢
TOTAL	89%	🟢

Modified Files

File	Coverage	Status
src/bloqade/pyqrack/_init_.py	100%	🟢
src/bloqade/pyqrack/reg.py	95%	🟢
src/bloqade/squin/op/_init_.py	90%	🟢
src/bloqade/squin/op/stmts.py	99%	🟢
src/bloqade/squin/qubit.py	92%	🟢
src/bloqade/squin/wire.py	100%	🟢
TOTAL	96%	🟢

updated for commit: b559f84 by action🐍

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.63158% with 66 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/bloqade/pyqrack/squin/runtime.py	74.51%	53 Missing ⚠️
src/bloqade/pyqrack/squin/qubit.py	81.15%	13 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[david-pl]

So, the implementation here is somewhat complete. However, I'm still struggling with the wire dialect.

@weinbe58 @johnzl-777 how do you even create a Wire right now? I tried this:

@squin.wired
def main():
    q = squin.qubit.new(1)
    w = squin.wire.unwrap(q[0])
    x = squin.op.x()
    squin.wire.apply(x, w)
    return w

But, of course, squin.qubit.new isn't supported by the wired dialect. Is there something like a NewWire statement that is missing?

[david-pl]

@weinbe58 not sure about this one. We don't have a concept of a classical register in squin.

[david-pl]

@weinbe58 two more things:

• I'm not sure about the impl for MeasureAny, please have a look.
• I could also simplify the OperatorRuntime by simply assuming that whenever len(qubits) > 1 we are looking at a controlled gate. That would mean I could remove the control_apply method from all runtime classes, but I'm not sure how safe that assumption is. What do you think?