-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
add sharePath url option setting #1288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I've put it into draft for you :-) will have a look at this later this evening (CET time :-)) - this time hopefully without too much confusion from my side ;-) |
1st time using Meld. I'm not sure if the conflict resolve is clean
Is this still valid and ongoing? |
@JYC333 I still want it, if that counts :). I'm stuck with how to complete the implementation though. |
I can try to take a look if you don't mind |
that would be wonderful, thank you! |
merge fbe7d64 just catches the branch up to develop right? It doesn't yet attempt to address the anonymous routing problem I got stuck on? Just checking because with these changes I still get "checkAuth: Redirecting to share path. From: /, To: /share" in console with "Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete." in browser. However I'm not sure my local dev folder is clean. |
Yes, it's just merging develop for now, still look into the problem. Probably won't finish today through. |
@JYC333 , have you had the time to look into this one? |
Sorry didn't have enought time to work on this... If you want to take over, please go ahead, otherwise I think I probably can start look into it next week. |
FYI: I'll take a stab at it now |
FYI - having some progress here: https://github.com/TriliumNext/Notes/tree/feat/clean-share-url
|
thank you for the attention and work! |
work is now continuing on making the "cleanUrl" work — however quick question: @maphew What is the idea between using the "clean URL option" vs just using "/" as share root path? |
Hah, I'm having trouble remembering just what was in my mind when I chose those words. I wanted to accommodate folks who might want to have a dedicated/explicit "anything under this is public" element in the url, and to be able to use whatever word they want for that -- For myself I'm happy with the inverse: everything at |
ok, thanks for the confirmation — my current take on is PR: then we have one PR for the custom share route feature — and afterwards we can have a separate PR for the cleanUrl related stuff (if that is even possible or if it makes sense — I have a feeling that really is almost like something for a reverse proxy — but let's split it into a separate discussion when time has come :-)) |
This is a follow up to #1207 bare2share: adding a sharePath option setting under Other so that the anonymous url path can be
/
or/foo
instead of hardcoded to/share
.The options setting page is setup and works in that the setting is saved, but routing for anonymous user is broken. I'm stuck for now.
(meta: npx prettier has not been run. Also I don't see the control for setting this PR to draft, sorry. Review still welcome though!)