Skip to content

Add jenkins script for bootjdk cleanup #21802

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

AdamBrousseau
Copy link
Contributor

Remove all bootjdks from build machines.
Skip zos as they do not automatically repopulate.
Simply trigger all-nodes-matching-label job with appropriate params

Issue automation 355

@AdamBrousseau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AdamBrousseau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mahdipub for review.

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

pshipton commented May 6, 2025

[Pipeline] { (mac15-aarch64-2)
[Pipeline] sh
17:52:51  + rm -rf /Users/jenkins/bootjdks/jdk11 /Users/jenkins/bootjdks/jdk17 /Users/jenkins/bootjdks/jdk21 /Users/jenkins/bootjdks/jdk24
17:52:51  rm: /Users/jenkins/bootjdks/jdk17/man/man1/javap.1: Permission denied
... and many more

@AdamBrousseau
Copy link
Contributor Author

AdamBrousseau commented May 6, 2025

Manually addressed

@AdamBrousseau AdamBrousseau force-pushed the bootjdk_cleanup_job branch from fdd198a to 21c59fa Compare May 12, 2025 21:01
@AdamBrousseau AdamBrousseau force-pushed the bootjdk_cleanup_job branch from 21c59fa to 6e0e3f5 Compare May 13, 2025 16:54
Remove all bootjdks from build machines.
Skip zos as they do not automatically repopulate.
Simply trigger all-nodes-matching-label job with appropriate params

Issue automation 355

Signed-off-by: Adam Brousseau <adam.brousseau@ca.ibm.com>
@AdamBrousseau AdamBrousseau force-pushed the bootjdk_cleanup_job branch from 6e0e3f5 to 4d87ccc Compare May 13, 2025 17:25
@keithc-ca keithc-ca merged commit cf09cea into eclipse-openj9:master May 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@mahdipub
Copy link
Contributor

mahdipub commented May 14, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants