Skip to content

fix: remove duplicate line about actions #37643

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bo0tzz
Copy link
Contributor

@bo0tzz bo0tzz commented Apr 19, 2025

Why:

Closes: #37638

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 19, 2025 08:59
Copy link

welcome bot commented Apr 19, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes a duplicate bullet line regarding actions enablement in the setup instructions for code scanning.

  • Removed the redundant line about actions enablement and retained a single, conditional bullet for supported languages.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2025

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

⚠️ Warning: Our review server is experiencing latency issues.

The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on the review server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.

Source Review Production What Changed
code-security/code-scanning/enabling-code-scanning/configuring-default-setup-for-code-scanning-at-scale.md fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12
fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12

Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Apr 19, 2025
@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a PR to fix this! 🎉 I'll get it triaged for review.

@Sharra-writes Sharra-writes added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Apr 21, 2025
@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good! I'll get this added to the merge queue as soon as checks are passing. If you're interested in contributing again in the future, our "help wanted" label is a great place to look for issues we want help fixing! 💛

@Sharra-writes Sharra-writes added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into github:main with commit 0634618 Apr 22, 2025
43 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks very much for contributing! Your pull request has been merged 🎉 You should see your changes appear on the site in approximately 24 hours. If you're looking for your next contribution, check out our help wanted issues

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Duplicate lines in code-scanning docs
2 participants