Pre-commit lint staged only, add yarn test:coverage:file

[RembrandtK]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.83%. Comparing base (03d8d2a) to head (ecb5c49).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1172   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.83%   92.83%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        2415     2415           
  Branches      438      438           
=======================================
  Hits         2242     2242           
  Misses        173      173           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	92.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new script to run test coverage on a single test file and updates lint-staged commands for better code formatting.

• Adds a new bash script (test-coverage-file) that builds contracts, prepares configuration, and runs Hardhat coverage using a provided test file.
• Updates package.json to include a new test:coverage:file script and adjusts lint-staged commands for Solidity, TypeScript, and JavaScript files.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
packages/contracts/scripts/test-coverage-file	New bash script to run coverage for a provided test file.
packages/contracts/package.json	Added new test script definition and updated lint-staged commands.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

packages/contracts/package.json:107

• [nitpick] Confirm that running both 'prettier' and 'solhint --fix' for Solidity files is necessary, as this may introduce redundancy if one tool fulfills the formatting requirements.

prettier --write

[Copilot]

[nitpick] Consider adding cleanup of the 'addresses-local.json' file after test execution to avoid leaving residual files or accidental commits.

[RembrandtK]

@tmigone I think leaving the file is a designed feature of how other scripts work, so I am not going to change this unless you suggest I should.

[RembrandtK]

I realise that although I thought I was using the same tools currently in use for linting, the way I configured it might not conform to eslint-graph-config. I am going to check that first.

[RembrandtK]

Okay, seems actually this is aligned with the direction taken in prettier, it is eslint we are not using it for.