-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
release: 0.1.0-alpha.12 #83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stainless-app
wants to merge
74
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
release: 0.1.0-alpha.12 #83
stainless-app
wants to merge
74
commits into
main
from
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chore(internal): remove some unnecessary `constructor` keywords
ebcdad7
to
9eba32c
Compare
21b351c
to
54e8c73
Compare
e2d2097
to
687dd63
Compare
0aef5fc
to
3d4d199
Compare
a278d65
to
e6da0bf
Compare
30df149
to
301bc32
Compare
chore(internal): reorder some params methodsc chore(internal): delete duplicate tests chore(internal): refactor some test assertions
9918166
to
cdf2938
Compare
9775702
to
caff21a
Compare
48860cc
to
2cb59ec
Compare
7aea973
to
7bcb837
Compare
9a55751
to
15ccde0
Compare
26c2fa0
to
7520d53
Compare
a262849
to
420f95c
Compare
828004d
to
6a5c141
Compare
ced87b5
to
76afcb9
Compare
8888d4f
to
e8b984c
Compare
21a72c5
to
8fdd96d
Compare
d14f4ae
to
afb521e
Compare
33331ea
to
7ae882e
Compare
966f9ef
to
ded01c5
Compare
f50db1b
to
f3cbb18
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated Release PR
0.1.0-alpha.12 (2025-04-25)
Full Changelog: v0.1.0-alpha.11...v0.1.0-alpha.12
⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
exception.error()._additionalProperties()
, which would returnMap<String, JsonValue>
. Now you would access this viaexception.body()
, which returnsJsonValue
. You should no longer assume that the returned error JSON is an object. You can check viaexception.body().asObject()
.Features
close
method (207ba78)Bug Fixes
validate()
during deserialization if we don't have to (#101) (5ce9c06)Optional<T>
instead ofOptional<? extends T>
(#109) (c2c1501)list
response variables (#103) (c1cde72)Performance Improvements
HttpResponseFor
(#107) (3bd7a4c)Chores
ErrorHandlingTest
(2fca9f1)constructor
keywords (882eb61)assertNotNull
calls (ac5dc3b)getPathParam
(#88) (ece3d6d)getNullable
togetOptional
(#108) (3975381)Documentation
async
andsync
method comments (0083c41)build
method comments (#86) (e6da0bf)JsonField
classes (c2c1501)This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.
The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.
For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.
🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions