Skip to content

Add simple build on Windows CI action #276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wiktor-k
Copy link
Collaborator

Okay, it seems to build on Windows... now... we need a soft token to run the tests with... any suggestions? 😅

Signed-off-by: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>
@ivozeba
Copy link
Contributor

ivozeba commented May 30, 2025

Perfect timing, before I went on vacation I started looking into how to get kryoptic to work on Windows.

I did manage to get it to build and run but there's a bit of thought that needs to go into how to get the different build variants working on Windows e.g. fips.

Softhsm is quite a pain to compile for windows. An alternate solution could be BouncyHSM (maintainer is quite active) but you won't be able to execute the test suite as is and it's written in C# so may not be straight forward to contribute.

I'll create a fork on kryoptic with my changes as a prep to a PR, maybe we can hack at it together?

@wiktor-k
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wiktor-k commented Jun 2, 2025

Softhsm is quite a pain to compile for windows. An alternate solution could be BouncyHSM (maintainer is quite active) but you won't be able to execute the test suite as is and it's written in C# so may not be straight forward to contribute.

Nah, it seems kryoptic looks like a natural fit. I agree with your assessment that we need CI support for that there first (it looks promising now! 🎉).

I'll create a fork on kryoptic with my changes as a prep to a PR, maybe we can hack at it together?

Oh, yeah, I'm definitely on board with the idea. I'd ideally want to use cryptoki for a cross-OS software. It's just my time constraints are pretty tight 😬 so please keep pinging me if anything needs adjustment. Sorry for not having more to offer but if you don't mind me being a bit slow I think it's just a matter of time. Thanks for your efforts! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants