Skip to content

Exporting start_time in InstructionEvent to Inspector #10295

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juyoung-meta
Copy link

Summary:
ETDump profiled data does not include start_time information when
Inspector analyzes Events. Although InstructionEvent's ProfileEvent member
contains start_time and end_time information, they are used to only
elpased_time which is exposed to Inspect. However, without the information, we
are unable to visualize the time-series view of operator executions. This diff
is to expose the start_time to Inspector so that it can access the start_time
information.

Differential Revision: D72740782

Summary:
ETDump profiled data does not include start_time information when
Inspector analyzes Events. Although InstructionEvent's ProfileEvent member
contains start_time and end_time information, they are used to only
elpased_time which is exposed to Inspect. However, without the information, we
are unable to visualize the time-series view of operator executions. This diff
is to expose the start_time to Inspector so that it can access the start_time
information.

Differential Revision: D72740782
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10295

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 5 New Failures

As of commit 7f1861c with merge base 08c07fa (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 18, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72740782

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@juyoung-meta
Copy link
Author

@pytorchbot label "release note: visualization"

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Didn't find following labels among repository labels: release note: visualization

Gasoonjia added a commit to Gasoonjia/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
Summary:

ETDump profiled data does not include start_time information when Inspector analyzes Events. Although InstructionEvent's ProfileEvent member contains start_time and end_time information, they are used to only elpased_time which is exposed to Inspect. However, without the information, we are unable to visualize the time-series view of operator executions. This diff is to expose the start_time to Inspector so that it can access the start_time information.

#### A resulting visualization example with start_time
 {F1977252760}

Differential Revision: D72740782
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Differential Revision: D72740782

Pull Request resolved: #10344
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants