-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
Breaking: more consistent (dis)aggregation of lookups #914
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tiemvanderdeure
wants to merge
11
commits into
rafaqz:main
Choose a base branch
from
tiemvanderdeure:disaggregate_shiftlocus
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9ebe0e6
shift locus before disaggregating a lookup
tiemvanderdeure e0752c6
add test
tiemvanderdeure 7e018be
more proper fix
tiemvanderdeure 9f903c3
test that extent is preserved
tiemvanderdeure 745cccf
remove stray show
tiemvanderdeure c46ca95
tweak tests
tiemvanderdeure 48e29ea
add a comment to `ceil`
tiemvanderdeure 4587114
Merge branch 'main' into disaggregate_shiftlocus
tiemvanderdeure aeeccee
handle aggregation of irregular lookups
tiemvanderdeure 3b6ef30
fix a method ambiguity
tiemvanderdeure 9b750c6
fix another method ambiguity
tiemvanderdeure File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't aggregating
Irregular
ok in some cases?Like its a bit wrong to do with mean but fine with sum?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is in lookup aggregation. How should we aggregate irregular lookups?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just like they were in the past... Start and end locus are especially simple. It's just dropping the other values.
Center is a bit more complicated, I guess the middle of the aggregated range?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added an extra check for regular - so for irregular lookups it works basically like it used to.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually we might want the old behaviour for point lookups as well - I'm not sure