Skip to content

docs: fix typo #141037

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

docs: fix typo #141037

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GarmashAlex
Copy link

fixed a minor typo
from substutition to substitution

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 15, 2025

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-rustc-dev-guide Area: rustc-dev-guide S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 15, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 15, 2025

The rustc-dev-guide subtree was changed. If this PR only touches the dev guide consider submitting a PR directly to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide otherwise thank you for updating the dev guide with your changes.

cc @BoxyUwU, @jieyouxu, @Kobzol

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented May 15, 2025

Please don't send trivial typo fixes for rustc-dev-guide against this repo unless it accompanies a compiler/library/bootstrap/rustdoc change too, as it increase chance of josh merge conflicts. Instead, please send it against https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/. Thanks for the PR.

@jieyouxu jieyouxu closed this May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustc-dev-guide Area: rustc-dev-guide S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants