-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
Implement #6413 : Data pages of newly gbak restored databases should marked as "swept" [CORE6164] #8549
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hvlad
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
work/gh_6413_restore_swept
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Implement #6413 : Data pages of newly gbak restored databases should marked as "swept" [CORE6164] #8549
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
inline bool sweptOnRestore(thread_db* tdbb, jrd_rel* rel)
.isGbak()
is not 100% safe to use. I remember I tested a case where I created some DB trigger which inserts/updates data. And when I startedgbak -b
, the normal swept flag logic wasn't working during execution of the trigger. So we need to distinguish between backup and restore.isRWGbak()
is more suitable here but it's not going to work right away.ATT_creator
is also should be passed to parallel worker attachments. To do that, I createdisc_dpb_gbak_restore_rel_attach
soJProvider::internalAttach
can check it along withisc_dpb_gbak_attach
and setATT_creator
.If it's needed, I can provide a patch with these corrections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DBB_restore
flag (DBB_creating
is already exists and serve another purposes) and clear this flag on disconnect. The only risk here is if user creates attachment while database is restored and changes some data, but this is not supported anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
User applications using
isc_create_database()
can do many things in the attachment, not only restore.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is possible only when restore is parallel due to DB multi shutdown mode, right? Maybe, when
DBB_restore
is set, only attachments withisc_dpb_gbak_attach
should be allowed.